Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Johnson v. Woodruff, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Venola M. Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Louis F. Woodruff which was denied by the district court. Johnson appealed pro se. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Johnson's complaint and denial of her motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the rulings of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-06-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1123

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Venola M. Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Louis F. Woodruff which was denied by the district court. Johnson appealed pro se. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Johnson's complaint and denial of her motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the rulings of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Johnson v. Woodruff, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Venola M. Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Louis F. Woodruff which was denied by the district court. Johnson appealed pro se. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Johnson's complaint and denial of her motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the rulings of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1123

    VENOLA M. JOHNSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LOUIS F. WOODRUFF,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (5:05-cv-00272-BR)

    Submitted: June 22, 2006

    Decided: June 28, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Venola M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Pro Se.

    Louis F. Woodruff, Appellee

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Venola M. Johnson appeals the district courts orders
    denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint and denying
    her motion for reconsideration.

    We have reviewed the record and

    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the


    district

    court.

    Johnson

    v.

    Woodruff,

    (E.D.N.C. Apr. 29 & July 7, 2005).

    No.

    5:05-cv-00272-BR

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like