Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Mitchell, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Willie J. Williams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied relief to Williams. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision. The appellate court provided no oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-08-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7545

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Willie J. Williams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied relief to Williams. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision. The appellate court provided no oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Williams v. Mitchell, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Willie J. Williams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied relief to Williams. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision. The appellate court provided no oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7545

    WILLIE J. WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DAVID MITCHELL; MARGIE LAWLER; RICHARD TIRRELL
    TERRY,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    RANDY LEE; D. S. LORD; W. D. SLEDGE;
    MR. PERSON; JENNIFER H. LANGLEY; LEWIS SMITH,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (5:05-ct-00304-FL)

    Submitted:

    July 31, 2007

    Decided:

    August 28, 2007

    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Willie J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Willie J. Williams appeals the district courts orders
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Williams v.

    Mitchell, No. 5:05-ct-00304-FL (E.D.N.C. July 26, 2005; Aug. 18 &


    Oct. 12, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like