Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Andrew Lee Harris v. Earl D. Beshears Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 70 F.3d 1261, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1995. It involves a petitioner, Andrew Lee Harris, who filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion and reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-12-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 70 F.3d 1261 Docket: 95-7022

    Original Title

    Andrew Lee Harris v. Earl D. Beshears Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 70 F.3d 1261, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1995. It involves a petitioner, Andrew Lee Harris, who filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion and reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views1 page

    Andrew Lee Harris v. Earl D. Beshears Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 70 F.3d 1261, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1995. It involves a petitioner, Andrew Lee Harris, who filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion and reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    70 F.

    3d 1261

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Andrew Lee HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Earl D. BESHEARS; Attorney General of the State Of
    Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 95-7022.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: October 3, 1995.
    Decided: December 5, 1995.

    Andrew Lee Harris, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
    General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
    Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Harris v. Beshears, No. CA-95-1734-S (D. Md. June 23,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like