Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Johnson v. Caledonia Corr Inst, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Nathaniel Johnson's § 1983 complaint against Caledonia Correctional Institution. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Johnson v. Caledonia Corr Inst, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Nathaniel Johnson's § 1983 complaint against Caledonia Correctional Institution. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7408

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Nathaniel Johnson's § 1983 complaint against Caledonia Correctional Institution. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Johnson v. Caledonia Corr Inst, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Nathaniel Johnson's § 1983 complaint against Caledonia Correctional Institution. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7408

    NATHANIEL JOHNSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CALEDONIA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-98-222-5-H)

    Submitted:

    January 21, 1999

    Decided:

    February 9, 1999

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Nathaniel Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.

    We have re-

    viewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. See Johnson v. Caledonia Correctional Institution,


    No. CA-98-222-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 1998).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like