Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bruce E. Anderson v. Warden, Bland Correctional Center, 82 F.3d 409, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The document is an appellate court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the lower court's denial of Bruce Anderson's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 82 F.3d 409 Docket: 94-7119

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an appellate court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the lower court's denial of Bruce Anderson's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Bruce E. Anderson v. Warden, Bland Correctional Center, 82 F.3d 409, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an appellate court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the lower court's denial of Bruce Anderson's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    82 F.

    3d 409

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Bruce E. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN, Bland Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 94-7119.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 30, 1995.
    Decided April 19, 1996.

    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-93-759)
    Bruce E. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. 2254 (1988) petition.* We have reviewed the record and the
    magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
    on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Anderson v. Warden, No. CA-93-759
    (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28


    U.S.C. 636(c) (1988)

    You might also like