Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Linwood McLaughlin v. Buford M. Parsons, Nancy Bryan, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Henrico County, 883 F.2d 69, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a district court ruling denying relief to plaintiff Linwood McLaughlin under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Linwood McLaughlin v. Buford M. Parsons, Nancy Bryan, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Henrico County, 883 F.2d 69, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a district court ruling denying relief to plaintiff Linwood McLaughlin under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-08-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 883 F.2d 69 Docket: 89-7015

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a district court ruling denying relief to plaintiff Linwood McLaughlin under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views1 page

    Linwood McLaughlin v. Buford M. Parsons, Nancy Bryan, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Henrico County, 883 F.2d 69, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a district court ruling denying relief to plaintiff Linwood McLaughlin under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    883 F.

    2d 69
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Linwood MCLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Buford M. PARSONS, Nancy Bryan, Assistant Commonwealth
    Attorney of Henrico County, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-7015.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 7, 1989.
    Decided Aug. 14, 1989.

    Linwood McLaughlin, appellant pro se.


    Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Linwood McLaughlin appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. McLaughlin v. Parsons, C/A No. 88-747-N
    (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive
    issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like