Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Green v. Maroules, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    1) Georgia Green appealed the district court's denial of relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Christopher Maroules and others, as well as the denial of her motions for reconsideration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied Green's motion for appointment of counsel and waived oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-07-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1051

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Georgia Green appealed the district court's denial of relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Christopher Maroules and others, as well as the denial of her motions for reconsideration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied Green's motion for appointment of counsel and waived oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Green v. Maroules, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Georgia Green appealed the district court's denial of relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Christopher Maroules and others, as well as the denial of her motions for reconsideration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied Green's motion for appointment of counsel and waived oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1051

    GEORGIA A. GREEN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CHRISTOPHER MAROULES; CHRISTOPHER CAFE;
    Sheriff; HENRY CLAYTON KEEL, Sheriff;
    Sheriff; W.E. BILLY SMITH, Sheriff,

    CHRIS
    ALLEN

    JENKINS,
    SEYMOUR,

    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Greenville.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (4:04-cv-00111-H)

    Submitted:

    July 23, 2009

    Decided:

    July 27, 2009

    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Georgia A. Green, Appellant Pro Se.


    Dal Floyd Wooten, III,
    Kinston, North Carolina; Kari Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER
    & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Georgia

    A.

    Green

    appeals

    from

    the

    district

    courts

    orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint


    and denying her motions for reconsideration.
    the record and find no reversible error.
    for

    the

    Maroules,

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    district

    court.

    Green

    v.

    No. 4:04-cv-00111-H (E.D.N.C. June 4, 2007; Sept. 2,

    2008, Oct. 31, 2008, Nov. 5, 2008, Dec. 1, 2008 & Jan. 5, 2009).
    We deny Greens motion for appointment of counsel and dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like