Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Steven Ashworth v. David Berkebile, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Steven Todd Ashworth's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As such, the court affirmed the district court's judgment denying relief to Ashworth. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Steven Ashworth v. David Berkebile, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Steven Todd Ashworth's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As such, the court affirmed the district court's judgment denying relief to Ashworth. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-02-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7107

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Steven Todd Ashworth's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As such, the court affirmed the district court's judgment denying relief to Ashworth. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Steven Ashworth v. David Berkebile, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Steven Todd Ashworth's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As such, the court affirmed the district court's judgment denying relief to Ashworth. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7107

    STEVEN TODD ASHWORTH,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    DAVID BERKEBILE, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
    Irene C. Berger,
    District Judge. (5:09-cv-01106)

    Submitted:

    January 31, 2012

    Decided:

    February 2, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Steven Todd Ashworth, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Steven Todd Ashworth, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district

    courts

    order

    accepting

    the

    recommendation

    of

    the

    magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241


    (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    district courts judgment.

    error.

    We have reviewed the record


    Accordingly,

    we

    affirm

    the

    See Ashworth v. Berkebile, No. 5:09-

    cv-01106 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 11, 2011).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like