Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Vincent Andrew Curtis v. Edward W. Murray, Director, 70 F.3d 1261, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1995 in which Vincent Curtis appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition by the district court. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of probable cause and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-11-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 70 F.3d 1261 Docket: 95-6753

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1995 in which Vincent Curtis appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition by the district court. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of probable cause and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views1 page

    Vincent Andrew Curtis v. Edward W. Murray, Director, 70 F.3d 1261, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1995 in which Vincent Curtis appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition by the district court. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of probable cause and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    70 F.

    3d 1261

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Vincent Andrew CURTIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 95-6753.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: November 16, 1995.
    Decided: November 28, 1995.

    Vincent Andrew Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Quentin Harris,


    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
    Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    probable cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    Curtis v. Murray, No. CA-93-1529-A (E.D.Va., Apr. 13, 1995). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like