Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Brailey v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Virginia, Inc., 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Willis Brailey appealed a district court's judgment in favor of his former employer, Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Virginia, Inc., after a bench trial on Brailey's federal discrimination claims. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's judgment. 3) The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Brailey v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Virginia, Inc., 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) Willis Brailey appealed a district court's judgment in favor of his former employer, Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Virginia, Inc., after a bench trial on Brailey's federal discrimination claims. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's judgment. 3) The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-05-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1874

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Willis Brailey appealed a district court's judgment in favor of his former employer, Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Virginia, Inc., after a bench trial on Brailey's federal discrimination claims. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's judgment. 3) The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Brailey v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Virginia, Inc., 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Willis Brailey appealed a district court's judgment in favor of his former employer, Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Virginia, Inc., after a bench trial on Brailey's federal discrimination claims. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's judgment. 3) The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1874

    WILLIS A. BRAILEY,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    ADVANCE AMERICA CASH ADVANCE CENTERS OF VIRGINIA, INC.,
    Defendant Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (3:08-cv-00365-RLW)

    Submitted:

    May 20, 2010

    Decided:

    May 24, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Willis A. Brailey, Appellant Pro Se.


    Charles Edgar McDonald,
    III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville,
    South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Willis A. Brailey appeals the district courts final
    judgment in favor of his former employer after a bench trial on
    his federal discrimination claims.
    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    district courts judgment.

    We have reviewed the record


    Accordingly,

    we

    affirm

    the

    Brailey v. Advance Am. Cash Advance

    Ctrs. of VA, Inc., 3:08-cv-00365-RLW (E.D. Va. July 27, 2009).


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like