Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Scott Valentine appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under Title VII. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision, finding that Valentine's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Valentine's claims in an order dated December 1, 1988. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Scott Valentine appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under Title VII. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision, finding that Valentine's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Valentine's claims in an order dated December 1, 1988. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-06-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 875 F.2d 317 Docket: 89-1001

    Original Title

    Scott S. Valentine v. Gladys Brown, Acting Director, Umcp Human Relations Programs Office, John B. Slaughter, Chancellor, John M. Thompson, Manager of Employee Relations & Development, Dale O. Anderson, Director, Personnel Services Department, University of Maryland, 875 F.2d 317, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Scott Valentine appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under Title VII. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision, finding that Valentine's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Valentine's claims in an order dated December 1, 1988. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Scott Valentine appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under Title VII. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision, finding that Valentine's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Valentine's claims in an order dated December 1, 1988. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    875 F.

    2d 317
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Scott S. VALENTINE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Gladys BROWN, Acting Director, UMCP Human Relations
    Programs
    Office, John B. Slaughter, Chancellor, John M. Thompson,
    Manager of Employee Relations & Development, Dale O.
    Anderson, Director, Personnel Services Department,
    University of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-1001.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 28, 1989.
    Decided May 3, 1989.
    Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 1, 1989.

    Scott S. Valentine, appellant pro se.


    Lawrence White, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, for
    appellees.
    Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Scott S. Valentine appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    Title VII. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that
    this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Valentine v. Brown, C/A No. 88-1702-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 1,

    1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like