Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Karl Dalvin Cuff, 107 F.3d 868, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Karl Dalvin Cuff's motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The Fourth Circuit also denied Cuff's pending motion to appoint counsel and did not hold oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 107 F.3d 868 Docket: 96-6632

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Karl Dalvin Cuff's motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The Fourth Circuit also denied Cuff's pending motion to appoint counsel and did not hold oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views1 page

    United States v. Karl Dalvin Cuff, 107 F.3d 868, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Karl Dalvin Cuff's motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The Fourth Circuit also denied Cuff's pending motion to appoint counsel and did not hold oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    107 F.

    3d 868

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Karl Dalvin CUFF, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 96-6632.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 31, 1997.
    Decided Feb. 25, 1997.

    Karl Dalvin Cuff, Appellant Pro Se.


    Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk,
    Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28
    U.S.C. 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty
    Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cuff, No. CR-934-NN; CA-96-4-NN (E.D.Va. Mar. 22, 1996). We deny Appellant's pending
    motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like