Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Rudolph Lane, A/K/A Bay Boy, 108 F.3d 1374, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Rudolph Lane of a district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the case based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 108 F.3d 1374 Docket: 96-7138

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Rudolph Lane of a district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the case based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views1 page

    United States v. Rudolph Lane, A/K/A Bay Boy, 108 F.3d 1374, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Rudolph Lane of a district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the case based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    108 F.

    3d 1374

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Rudolph LANE, a/k/a Bay Boy, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 96-7138.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 27, 1997.
    Decided March 11, 1997.

    Rudolph Lane, Appellant Pro Se.


    Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.
    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed under
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death
    Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lane, Nos. CR-92-88-N, CA96-176-2 (E.D.Va. July 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like