Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ho v. West, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Philip Ho brought an employment discrimination action against Togo West. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning in granting summary judgment for the defendant. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so oral arguments were not necessary. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-06-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-1253

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Philip Ho brought an employment discrimination action against Togo West. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning in granting summary judgment for the defendant. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so oral arguments were not necessary. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Ho v. West, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Philip Ho brought an employment discrimination action against Togo West. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning in granting summary judgment for the defendant. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so oral arguments were not necessary. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-1253

    PHILIP Y. HO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    TOGO D. WEST, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
    (CA-99-529-3)

    Submitted:

    May 25, 2000

    Decided:

    June 2, 2000

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Philip Y. Ho, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Philip Y. Ho appeals from the district courts order granting
    summary judgment for Defendant in his employment discrimination
    action. We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.
    reasoning of the district court.
    (E.D. Va. Feb. 3 & 4, 2000).

    Accordingly, we affirm on the


    See Ho v. West, No. CA-99-529-3

    We dispense with oral argument be-

    cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like