Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United Bond and Mortgage Corporation v. Crown Central Petroleum Corporation, 374 F.2d 510, 4th Cir. (1967)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina to refuse to entertain a collateral attack on a final judgment from a state court. The state court had proper jurisdiction over the original civil litigation. In a brief per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit agreed with the District Court's reasoning as announced in open court and found that the District Court properly refused to consider the collateral attack on the valid state court judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1967-03-10 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 374 F.2d 510 Docket: 11007_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina to refuse to entertain a collateral attack on a final judgment from a state court. The state court had proper jurisdiction over the original civil litigation. In a brief per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit agreed with the District Court's reasoning as announced in open court and found that the District Court properly refused to consider the collateral attack on the valid state court judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views1 page

    United Bond and Mortgage Corporation v. Crown Central Petroleum Corporation, 374 F.2d 510, 4th Cir. (1967)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina to refuse to entertain a collateral attack on a final judgment from a state court. The state court had proper jurisdiction over the original civil litigation. In a brief per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit agreed with the District Court's reasoning as announced in open court and found that the District Court properly refused to consider the collateral attack on the valid state court judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    374 F.

    2d 510

    UNITED BOND AND MORTGAGE CORPORATION,


    Appellant,
    v.
    CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION,
    Appellee.
    No. 11007.

    United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.


    Argued March 7, 1967.
    Decided March 10, 1967.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
    Carolina, at Columbia; Robert W. Hemphill, Judge.
    Charles F. Cooper, Columbia, S. C., for appellant.
    Irvine F. Belser and Belser, Belser & Baker, Columbia, S. C., Fulmer,
    Barnes, Berry & Austin, Columbia S. C., and Cable & McDaniel,
    Baltimore, Md., on brief, for appellee.
    Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and J. SPENCER
    BELL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    For the reasons announced in open court, we think the District Court properly
    refused to entertain this collateral attack upon a final judgment of a state court
    having jurisdiction of this civil litigation.

    Affirmed.

    You might also like