Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Akere, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Olawale Akere's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and request for in camera review of certain documents. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinions and found no reversible error. The Court adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Akere's § 2255 motion and dismissing the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Akere, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Olawale Akere's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and request for in camera review of certain documents. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinions and found no reversible error. The Court adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Akere's § 2255 motion and dismissing the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-11-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7219

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Olawale Akere's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and request for in camera review of certain documents. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinions and found no reversible error. The Court adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Akere's § 2255 motion and dismissing the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views3 pages

    United States v. Akere, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Olawale Akere's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and request for in camera review of certain documents. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinions and found no reversible error. The Court adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Akere's § 2255 motion and dismissing the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7219

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    OLAWALE AKERE, a/k/a Willie,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    No. 99-7119

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    OLAWALE AKERE, a/k/a Willie,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-94-174-A, CA-97-1081-AM)

    Submitted:

    November 18, 1999

    Decided:

    November 23, 1999

    Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Olawale Akere, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Olawale Akere seeks to appeal the district courts orders
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    1999), and declining to allow in camera review of certain documents.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ions and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See United States v. Akere, Nos. CR-94-174-A;

    CR-94-174-A (E.D. Va. December 17, 1997 & July 22, 1998).*

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    Although the district courts order is marked as filed on


    July 21, 1999, the district courts records show that it was
    entered on the docket sheet on July 22, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58
    and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date
    that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the
    effective date of the district courts decision. See Wilson v.
    Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
    3

    You might also like