Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Adkins v. Gainey, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. Michael Adkins filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint that was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. They also denied Adkins' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-07-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6654

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. Michael Adkins filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint that was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. They also denied Adkins' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Adkins v. Gainey, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. Michael Adkins filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint that was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. They also denied Adkins' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6654

    MICHAEL ANTHONY ADKINS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MRS. GAINEY, R.N.; MS. STAPPS, R.N.; JAMES E.
    DOOLEY, Sheriff,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-05-200-7)

    Submitted:

    June 23, 2005

    Decided:

    July 1, 2005

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Anthony Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Anthony Adkins appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    deny his motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
    reasons stated by the district court.
    CA-05-200-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 8, 2005).

    See Adkins v. Gainey, No.


    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like