Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Danny Ray Shafer Claude Delmus Shafer, 61 F.3d 901, 4th Cir. (1995)
United States v. Danny Ray Shafer Claude Delmus Shafer, 61 F.3d 901, 4th Cir. (1995)
3d 901
Danny Ray Shafer, Claude Delmus Shafer, Appellants Pro Se. Stephen
Urban Baer, Charlottesville, VA, for Appellee.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's orders denying relief under 42
U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988), and denying his motion to reconsider denial of relief
under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988). We have reviewed the district court's orders
and opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shafer, Nos. CA-94-755-R; CR92-70112 (W.D.Va. Nov. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED