Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scott Anthony Bradshaw v. United States, 76 F.3d 371, 4th Cir. (1996)
Scott Anthony Bradshaw v. United States, 76 F.3d 371, 4th Cir. (1996)
3d 371
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-257A)
Scott Anthony Bradshaw, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Bradshaw v. United States, No. CA-95-257-A (E.D.Va.
Oct. 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED