Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Asemani v. Green, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Billy G. Asemani under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Asemani. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7925

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Billy G. Asemani under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Asemani. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Asemani v. Green, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Billy G. Asemani under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied relief to Asemani. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7925

    BILLY G. ASEMANI,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden, ECI-E; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER,
    Commissioner, Division of Corrections (D.O.C.); GARY
    MAYNARD,
    Secretary,
    Department
    of
    Public
    Safety
    and
    Correctional Services; BRATTEN, Ms., Health Administrator
    ECI,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:08-cv-03397-RDB)

    Submitted:

    June 17, 2010

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    KING,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    June 24, 2010

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephanie Judith Lane
    Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
    Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Billy G. Asemani appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    Asemani v. Green, No. 1:08-cv-03397-RDB (D. Md. Sept.

    court.

    30, 2009).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like