Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Baldwin v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    James Baldwin filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction. The district court denied relief and Baldwin appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors. The court denied Baldwin's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The court determined that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-10-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6833

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Baldwin filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction. The district court denied relief and Baldwin appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors. The court denied Baldwin's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The court determined that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Baldwin v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Baldwin filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction. The district court denied relief and Baldwin appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors. The court denied Baldwin's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The court determined that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6833

    JAMES H. BALDWIN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-99-315-2)

    Submitted:

    September 28, 1999

    Decided:

    October 7, 1999

    Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James H. Baldwin, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant
    Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order denying relief on
    his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

    cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court. See Baldwin v. Angelone, No. CA-99-315-2 (E.D.
    Va. June 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like