Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Alonso, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Pedro Alonso's motion to modify the fine imposed as part of his criminal sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Alonso, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Pedro Alonso's motion to modify the fine imposed as part of his criminal sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-07-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6300

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Pedro Alonso's motion to modify the fine imposed as part of his criminal sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Alonso, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Pedro Alonso's motion to modify the fine imposed as part of his criminal sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6300

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    PEDRO ALONSO,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-00-136-1-7-F)

    Submitted:

    June 10, 2004

    Decided:

    July 14, 2004

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Pedro Alonso, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE


    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Pedro Alonso appeals the district courts order denying
    his Motion to Modify Condition of Fine Imposed.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Alonso, No. CR-00-136-1-7-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 7, 2004).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like