Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Christopher T. James filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson that was denied by the district court. James then filed a Rule 59(e) motion that was also denied. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed both of the district court's orders denying relief, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-10-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7147

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Christopher T. James filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson that was denied by the district court. James then filed a Rule 59(e) motion that was also denied. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed both of the district court's orders denying relief, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    James v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Christopher T. James filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson that was denied by the district court. James then filed a Rule 59(e) motion that was also denied. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed both of the district court's orders denying relief, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7147

    CHRISTOPHER T. JAMES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK JACKSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
    District Judge. (3:06-cv-00220)

    Submitted: October 17, 2006

    Decided: October 23, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Christopher T. James, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher T. James appeals the district courts orders
    denying relief on both his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint and
    subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
    record and find no reversible error.
    district

    courts

    orders.

    See

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm the


    James

    v.

    North

    Carolina,

    3:06-cv-00220 (W.D.N.C. May 17, 2006 & June 19, 2006). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like