Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Cooper v. Pinkerton Security, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carl Benit Cooper appealed the district court's dismissal of his claim of a conspiracy among several parties that ultimately resulted in his criminal convictions. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Cooper's conspiracy claim lacked merit. In an unpublished opinion, the three-judge panel determined that the district court properly dismissed the case for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court denied Cooper's appeal without holding oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Cooper v. Pinkerton Security, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Carl Benit Cooper appealed the district court's dismissal of his claim of a conspiracy among several parties that ultimately resulted in his criminal convictions. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Cooper's conspiracy claim lacked merit. In an unpublished opinion, the three-judge panel determined that the district court properly dismissed the case for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court denied Cooper's appeal without holding oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1252

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carl Benit Cooper appealed the district court's dismissal of his claim of a conspiracy among several parties that ultimately resulted in his criminal convictions. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Cooper's conspiracy claim lacked merit. In an unpublished opinion, the three-judge panel determined that the district court properly dismissed the case for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court denied Cooper's appeal without holding oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Cooper v. Pinkerton Security, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carl Benit Cooper appealed the district court's dismissal of his claim of a conspiracy among several parties that ultimately resulted in his criminal convictions. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Cooper's conspiracy claim lacked merit. In an unpublished opinion, the three-judge panel determined that the district court properly dismissed the case for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court denied Cooper's appeal without holding oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1252

    CARL BENIT COOPER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PINKERTON SECURITY, et al; ANDREW JOHN SAVAGE,
    III, Esquire; EDUARDO KELVIN CURRY, Esquire;
    MICHAEL S. SEEKINGS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (4:06-cv-01448-CMC)

    Submitted:

    September 17, 2007

    Decided:

    October 9, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carl Benit Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Holmes Hood, HOOD LAW
    FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina; John A. Massalon, WILLS &
    MASSALON, Charleston, South Carolina; Joseph Rutledge Young, III,
    DUFFY & YOUNG, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina; Eduardo Kelvin
    Curry, CURRY, CURRY & COUNTS, Charleston, South Carolina; Timothy
    William Bouch, LEATH, BOUCH & CRAWFORD, LLP, Charleston, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Carl Benit Cooper appeals a district court order and
    judgment adopting the magistrate judges report and recommendation
    and dismissing his claim of a conspiracy among several parties
    ultimately resulting in his criminal convictions. We have reviewed
    the record and the district courts order and affirm for the
    reasons cited by the district court.

    See Cooper v. Pinkerton, No.

    4:06-cv-01448-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2007).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like