Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Floyd Garrett v. Christopher Zych, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Floyd Garrett, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his §2241 habeas petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Garrett's §2241 petition for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-12-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6943

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Floyd Garrett, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his §2241 habeas petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Garrett's §2241 petition for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Floyd Garrett v. Christopher Zych, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Floyd Garrett, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his §2241 habeas petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Garrett's §2241 petition for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6943

    FLOYD GARRETT,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Glen E. Conrad, Chief
    District Judge. (7:11-cv-00107-GEC)

    Submitted:

    December 15, 2011

    Decided:

    December 19, 2011

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Floyd Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Floyd

    Garrett,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241


    (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Garrett v. Zych, No.

    7:11-cv-00107-GEC (W.D. Va. July 6, 2011).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like