Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jasper Robertson v. Deputy Barriet, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    1) Jasper D. Robertson appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Deputy Barriet to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied Robertson's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-12-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7017

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Jasper D. Robertson appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Deputy Barriet to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied Robertson's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Jasper Robertson v. Deputy Barriet, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Jasper D. Robertson appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Deputy Barriet to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied Robertson's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7017

    JASPER D. ROBERTSON,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    DEPUTY BARRIET,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
    District Judge. (1:10-cv-00703-TSE-IDD)

    Submitted:

    December 15, 2011

    Decided:

    December 19, 2011

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jasper D. Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &


    COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jasper D. Robertson appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    Robertson v. Barriet, No. 1:10-cv-00703-TSE-IDD (E.D.

    court.
    Va.

    July

    counsel.
    legal
    before

    13,

    2011).

    We

    deny

    Robertsons

    motion

    to

    appoint

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like