Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Donald Carl Hunt v. Buddy McKinney J.A. Norman R.W. McKinney David Rankin Gary Gold, 54 F.3d 773, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views1 page
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Donald Carl Hunt filed a Section 1983 civil rights complaint against several defendants that was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision to accept the magistrate's recommendation. Therefore, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief to Hunt.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-05-22 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 54 F.3d 773 Docket: 94-7198

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Donald Carl Hunt filed a Section 1983 civil rights complaint against several defendants that was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision to accept the magistrate's recommendation. Therefore, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief to Hunt.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views1 page

    Donald Carl Hunt v. Buddy McKinney J.A. Norman R.W. McKinney David Rankin Gary Gold, 54 F.3d 773, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Donald Carl Hunt filed a Section 1983 civil rights complaint against several defendants that was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision to accept the magistrate's recommendation. Therefore, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief to Hunt.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    54 F.

    3d 773
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Donald Carl HUNT, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Buddy MCKINNEY; J.A. Norman; R.W. McKinney; David
    Rankin;
    Gary Gold, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 94-7198.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 20, 1995.
    Decided May 22, 1995.

    Donald Carl Hunt, appellant pro se. Grady Michael Barnhill, Womble,
    Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Charlotte, NC, for appellees.
    Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Hunt v. McKinney No. CA-93-47-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 1994). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like