Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Willis V., 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied James C. Willis's petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to direct the district court to act on his motions for a revocation hearing. The court found no unreasonable delay by the district court. While allowing Willis to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the petition without prejudice to refiling, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-09-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-571

    Original Title

    In re: Willis v., 4th Cir. (1998)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied James C. Willis's petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to direct the district court to act on his motions for a revocation hearing. The court found no unreasonable delay by the district court. While allowing Willis to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the petition without prejudice to refiling, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    In Re: Willis V., 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied James C. Willis's petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to direct the district court to act on his motions for a revocation hearing. The court found no unreasonable delay by the district court. While allowing Willis to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the petition without prejudice to refiling, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-571

    In Re:

    JAMES C. WILLIS,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-92-25-7-1)

    Submitted:

    August 13, 1998

    Decided:

    September 1, 1998

    Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James C. Willis, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Petitioner filed this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking
    to have this court direct the district court to act on his motions
    for a revocation hearing. We find no unreasonable delay. Therefore,
    while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the
    petition without prejudice to Petitioners right to refile the
    petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like