Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Patrick E. Woods v. Marvin N. Robbins Mr. Filbert, and Staff, 875 F.2d 317, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Patrick E. Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Marvin N. Robbins and other defendants which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed this denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Woods' appeal based on their review of the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Patrick E. Woods v. Marvin N. Robbins Mr. Filbert, and Staff, 875 F.2d 317, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    Patrick E. Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Marvin N. Robbins and other defendants which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed this denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Woods' appeal based on their review of the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-05-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 875 F.2d 317 Docket: 89-7039

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Patrick E. Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Marvin N. Robbins and other defendants which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed this denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Woods' appeal based on their review of the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views1 page

    Patrick E. Woods v. Marvin N. Robbins Mr. Filbert, and Staff, 875 F.2d 317, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Patrick E. Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Marvin N. Robbins and other defendants which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed this denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Woods' appeal based on their review of the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    875 F.

    2d 317
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Patrick E. WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Marvin N. ROBBINS; Mr. Filbert, and staff, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 89-7039.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: April 26, 1989.
    Decided: May 19, 1989.

    Patrick E. Woods, appellant pro se.


    Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Patrick E. Woods appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Woods v. Robbins, C/A No. 88-3659-B (D.Md.
    Dec. 27, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the material before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like