Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Freddy Campbell v. United States, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Freddy Campbell's second motion for relief from final judgment. The circuit court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the circuit court affirmed the district court's denial of Campbell's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Freddy Campbell v. United States, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Freddy Campbell's second motion for relief from final judgment. The circuit court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the circuit court affirmed the district court's denial of Campbell's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1733

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Freddy Campbell's second motion for relief from final judgment. The circuit court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the circuit court affirmed the district court's denial of Campbell's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Freddy Campbell v. United States, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Freddy Campbell's second motion for relief from final judgment. The circuit court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the circuit court affirmed the district court's denial of Campbell's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1733

    FREDDY S. CAMPBELL,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CARTER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER;
    RANDY BINION, Chief Jailer - Carter County Detention
    Center; JOHN PERRINE, Supervising Marshall - United States
    Marshals Service; BRENDA WILBURN, R.N. - Carter County
    Detention Center,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Charleston.
    John T. Copenhaver,
    Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-00503)

    Submitted:

    October 13, 2011

    Decided:

    October 17, 2011

    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Freddy S. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia; R.
    Stephen McGinnis, MCBRAYER, MCGINNIS, LESLIE & KIRKLAND, PLLC,
    Greenup, Kentucky, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Freddy S. Campbell appeals the district courts order
    denying his second motion for relief from final judgment under
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by

    court.

    the

    district

    Campbell

    v.

    2:09-cv-00503 (S.D.W. Va. June 20, 2011).

    United

    States,

    No.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like