Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. North Carolina Attorney General, 69 F.3d 534, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Cornelius Tucker Jr. filed a 28 U.S.C. §2254 petition that was denied by the district court. Tucker appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. North Carolina Attorney General, 69 F.3d 534, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    Cornelius Tucker Jr. filed a 28 U.S.C. §2254 petition that was denied by the district court. Tucker appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 69 F.3d 534 Docket: 95-7240

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Cornelius Tucker Jr. filed a 28 U.S.C. §2254 petition that was denied by the district court. Tucker appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views1 page

    Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. North Carolina Attorney General, 69 F.3d 534, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Cornelius Tucker Jr. filed a 28 U.S.C. §2254 petition that was denied by the district court. Tucker appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    69 F.

    3d 534

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Petitioner--Appellant,
    v.
    NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 95-7240.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Oct. 30, 1995.

    Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
    Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal
    and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. North Carolina
    Attorney General, No. CA-94-566-6 (M.D.N.C. July 6, 1995). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like