Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States Court of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit: Unpublished

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeals of Linwood Gray, Darrell Bracey, and Ronald Humphries, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of their motion to vacate, set aside or correct their sentences under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 9, 1999 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States Court of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit: Unpublished

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeals of Linwood Gray, Darrell Bracey, and Ronald Humphries, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of their motion to vacate, set aside or correct their sentences under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 9, 1999 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-09-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7481

    Original Title

    United States v. Gray, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeals of Linwood Gray, Darrell Bracey, and Ronald Humphries, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of their motion to vacate, set aside or correct their sentences under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 9, 1999 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views3 pages

    United States Court of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit: Unpublished

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeals of Linwood Gray, Darrell Bracey, and Ronald Humphries, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of their motion to vacate, set aside or correct their sentences under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 9, 1999 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7481

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LINWOOD GRAY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    No. 99-7482

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DARRELL BRACEY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    No. 99-7483

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RONALD M. HUMPHRIES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR94-241-DKC, CA-97-4287-DKC, CA-97-4288-DKC)

    Submitted:

    April 28, 2000

    Decided:

    September 18, 2000

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jeffrey Daniel Zimmerman, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellants.
    Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellants seek to appeal the district courts order denying
    their motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court.

    See United States v. Gray; United States v. Bracey; United

    States v. Humphries, Nos. CR-94-241-DKC; CA-97-4287-DKC; CA-974288-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 9, 1999).*

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    Although the district courts judgment or order is marked as


    filed on September 8, 1999, the district courts records show
    that it was entered on the docket sheet on September 9, 1999.
    Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
    Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on
    the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district
    courts decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35
    (4th Cir. 1986).
    3

    You might also like