Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Doe v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Walter Doe sued the United States, Pamela Roe, and Robert Noe. The district court dismissed the case. At oral arguments on appeal, the parties agreed there was no further relief that could be provided to the plaintiff. As a result, the appeals court dismissed the case as moot in an unpublished, non-binding opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1678

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Walter Doe sued the United States, Pamela Roe, and Robert Noe. The district court dismissed the case. At oral arguments on appeal, the parties agreed there was no further relief that could be provided to the plaintiff. As a result, the appeals court dismissed the case as moot in an unpublished, non-binding opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Doe v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Walter Doe sued the United States, Pamela Roe, and Robert Noe. The district court dismissed the case. At oral arguments on appeal, the parties agreed there was no further relief that could be provided to the plaintiff. As a result, the appeals court dismissed the case as moot in an unpublished, non-binding opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1678

    WALTER DOE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; PAMELA ROE, in her
    individual and official capacities; ROBERT
    NOE,
    in
    his
    individual
    and
    official
    capacities,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-02-02-4)

    Argued:

    April 1, 2003

    Decided:

    April 23, 2003

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG,* and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Judge Luttig was originally assigned to the panel in this


    case but did not hear oral argument. The decision is filed by a
    quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 46(d).

    ARGUED: Abram William VanderMeer, Jr., PENDER & COWARD, P.C.,


    Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant.
    Michael Anson Rhine,
    Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE,
    Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
    ON BRIEF: Paul J. McNulty,
    United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE, Norfolk,
    Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    During oral arguments held on April 1, 2003, the parties
    agreed that there was no longer any relief that could be had for
    the plaintiff in this case.

    Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed

    as moot.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like