Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Smith v. Pohlman, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Larry Eugene Smith Jr. appealed a district court order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants and denied his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that denied Smith's § 1983 complaint and motion for reconsideration. The appeals court also denied Smith's motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for costs.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-09-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6879

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Eugene Smith Jr. appealed a district court order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants and denied his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that denied Smith's § 1983 complaint and motion for reconsideration. The appeals court also denied Smith's motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for costs.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Smith v. Pohlman, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Eugene Smith Jr. appealed a district court order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants and denied his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that denied Smith's § 1983 complaint and motion for reconsideration. The appeals court also denied Smith's motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for costs.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6879

    LARRY EUGENE SMITH, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BARBARA POHLMAN, Dr., in her individual
    capacity; PAULA SMITH, Dr., in her individual
    capacity; GEORGE E. CURRIE, in his individual
    capacity,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-01-759-5-H)

    Submitted:

    August 28, 2003

    Decided:

    September 8, 2003

    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Larry Eugene Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry Eugene Smith, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint and denying
    his motion for reconsideration.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court. See Smith v. Pohlman, No. CA-01-7595-H (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 19, 2002 & entered Nov. 20, 2002; Jan. 31,
    2003).

    We also deny Smiths motion for appointment of counsel as

    well as his motion for costs.

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like