Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bush v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Larry Lamont Bush filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two police officers alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied Bush relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Bush relief. The appeals court also denied Bush's motion for appointment of counsel and decided oral arguments were not necessary, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-07-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6141

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Lamont Bush filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two police officers alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied Bush relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Bush relief. The appeals court also denied Bush's motion for appointment of counsel and decided oral arguments were not necessary, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Bush v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Lamont Bush filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two police officers alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied Bush relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Bush relief. The appeals court also denied Bush's motion for appointment of counsel and decided oral arguments were not necessary, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6141

    LARRY LAMONT BUSH,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ELLSWORTH JONES,
    Ofcr/Det #1041,

    Det.

    4444;

    TIM

    HOLEVAS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-0302263-01-AMD)

    Submitted:

    May 28, 2004

    Decided:

    July 9, 2004

    Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Larry Lamont Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara McFaul Cook, County
    Solicitor, Louis Paul Ruzzi, Carol Saffran-Brinks, COUNTY
    SOLICITORS OFFICE, Ellicott City, Maryland, Andrew Jensen Murray,
    ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry Lamont Bush seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Bush v. Jones, No. CA-03-02263-01-AMD (D. Md. filed

    Jan. 5, 2004, entered Jan. 6, 2004).

    We deny the motion for

    appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like