Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Maldonado, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-paragraph unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a defendant's (Anthony John Maldonado) appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. The appeals court affirmed the district court's order for the reasons stated therein and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Maldonado, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-paragraph unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a defendant's (Anthony John Maldonado) appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. The appeals court affirmed the district court's order for the reasons stated therein and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7053

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-paragraph unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a defendant's (Anthony John Maldonado) appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. The appeals court affirmed the district court's order for the reasons stated therein and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Maldonado, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-paragraph unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a defendant's (Anthony John Maldonado) appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. The appeals court affirmed the district court's order for the reasons stated therein and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7053

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ANTHONY JOHN
    Spanish,

    MALDONADO,

    a/k/a

    Herminio

    Parrilla,

    a/k/a

    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
    N. Carlton Tilley,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00220-NCT-1)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 2009

    Decided:

    December 28, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John David Bryson, WYATT, EARLY, HARRIS & WHEELER, LLP, High
    Point, North Carolina, for Appellant.
    L. Patrick Auld, Angela
    Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony
    order

    denying

    John

    his

    Maldonado

    motion

    for

    appeals

    the

    reduction

    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    district

    of

    courts

    sentence

    filed

    We have reviewed the

    record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion
    See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d

    in denying the motion.

    469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under 3582(c) is subject to


    the discretion of the district court); United States v. Legree,
    205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000).
    courts

    order

    for

    the

    reasons

    Thus, we affirm the district


    stated

    there.

    See

    United

    States v. Maldonado, No. 1:97-cr-00220-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. May 15,


    2009).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like