Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Spurlock v. Blevins, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Allen Spurlock under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two correctional officers. The district court denied Spurlock relief and he appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court also denied Spurlock's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7071

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Allen Spurlock under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two correctional officers. The district court denied Spurlock relief and he appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court also denied Spurlock's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Spurlock v. Blevins, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Allen Spurlock under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two correctional officers. The district court denied Spurlock relief and he appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court also denied Spurlock's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7071

    ALLEN SPURLOCK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    P. BLEVINS, Correctional Officer, Deep Meadow
    Correctional Center; RODRIGUEZ, Correctional
    Officer, Deep Meadow Correctional Center,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-02-482)

    Submitted:

    September 19, 2002

    Decided:

    September 30, 2002

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Allen Spurlock, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Allen Spurlock appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. See Spurlock v. Blevins, No. CA-02-482 (E.D. Va. filed July
    3, 2002 & entered July 5, 2002).

    We deny Spurlocks motion to

    appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like