Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Etienne v. United States, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Keslet Etienne's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Etienne v. United States, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Keslet Etienne's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-01-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7628

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Keslet Etienne's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Etienne v. United States, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Keslet Etienne's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7628

    KESLET ETIENNE, a/k/a Jose Jean Phillipe,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-487-BO-5)

    Submitted: January 15, 2004

    Decided:

    January 28, 2004

    Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Keslet Etienne, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant


    United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Keslet Etienne, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
    2241 (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See Etienne v. United States, No. CA-02-487-BO-5 (E.D.N.C.

    Sept. 5, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like