Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Henderson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Erik Henderson's motion to modify his sentence. Henderson had filed the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which allows for sentence modifications in limited circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-12-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7057

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Erik Henderson's motion to modify his sentence. Henderson had filed the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which allows for sentence modifications in limited circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Henderson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Erik Henderson's motion to modify his sentence. Henderson had filed the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which allows for sentence modifications in limited circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7057

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    ERIK D. HENDERSON,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:04-cr-00343-LMB-1)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 2008

    Decided:

    December 31, 2008

    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Erik D. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Mark D. Lytle, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Erik D. Henderson appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    motion

    to

    modify

    sentence

    pursuant

    to

    18

    U.S.C.

    3582(c) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Henderson, No. 1:04-cr-

    00343-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. June 2, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like