Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Tillett v. Owens, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Selvyn Tillett v. James Owens et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief to Plaintiff Tillett on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on its reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Tillett v. Owens, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Selvyn Tillett v. James Owens et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief to Plaintiff Tillett on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on its reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-06-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6484

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Selvyn Tillett v. James Owens et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief to Plaintiff Tillett on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on its reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Tillett v. Owens, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Selvyn Tillett v. James Owens et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief to Plaintiff Tillett on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on its reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6484

    SELVYN TILLETT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JAMES OWENS, Correctional Officer; RICHARD
    LANHAM, Commissioner of Corrections; EUGENE
    NUTH, Warden,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-2784-DKC)
    Submitted:

    June 12, 1997

    Decided:

    June 18, 1997

    Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Selvyn Tillett, Appellant Pro Se. J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
    General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Tillett v. Owens, No. CA-96-2784-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 24, 1997). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like