Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    United States v. Clark, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed James Edward Clark's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible errors. It therefore denied Clark a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its May 2002 opinion. The appellate court determined oral arguments were not necessary because the case details and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Clark, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed James Edward Clark's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible errors. It therefore denied Clark a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its May 2002 opinion. The appellate court determined oral arguments were not necessary because the case details and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6949

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed James Edward Clark's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible errors. It therefore denied Clark a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its May 2002 opinion. The appellate court determined oral arguments were not necessary because the case details and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Clark, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed James Edward Clark's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible errors. It therefore denied Clark a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its May 2002 opinion. The appellate court determined oral arguments were not necessary because the case details and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6949

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JAMES EDWARD CLARK,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CR-99-424-A, CA-01-1574-AM)

    Submitted:

    August 15, 2002

    Decided:

    August 26, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Edward Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Paul J. McNulty, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Edward Clark seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2000).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly,

    we

    deny

    certificate

    of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court.

    United States v. Clark, Nos. CR-99-424-A; CA-01-

    1574-AM (E.D. Va. filed May 1, 2002; entered May 3, 2002).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like