Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ellancer McGrady, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ellancer Allen McGrady's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and that additional arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-02-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7532

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ellancer Allen McGrady's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and that additional arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Ellancer McGrady, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ellancer Allen McGrady's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and that additional arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7532

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ELLANCER ALLEN MCGRADY, a/k/a Lance,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Shelby.
    Martin K. Reidinger,
    District Judge. (4:94-cr-00044-MR-1)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 2013

    Decided:

    February 28, 2013

    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ellancer Allen McGrady, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik,


    Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Asheville,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ellancer

    Allen

    McGrady

    appeals

    the

    district

    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    courts
    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    United

    States

    Aug. 10,
    facts

    McGrady,

    2012).

    and

    materials

    v.

    legal
    before

    We

    No.

    dispense

    4:94-cr-00044-MR-1

    with

    oral

    argument

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    (W.D.N.C.

    because

    presented

    would

    not

    See

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like