Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Langston v. Warden, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Thomas Langston's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-8560

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Thomas Langston's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Langston v. Warden, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Thomas Langston's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-8560

    THOMAS EUGENE LANGSTON,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    WARDEN, Mecklenberg Correctional Center,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District
    Judge. (CA-95-454-AM)
    Submitted:

    March 29, 1996

    Decided:

    April 19, 1996

    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Thomas Eugene Langston, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    Langston v. Warden, No. CA-95-454-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like