Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jones v. Smith, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views3 pages
    Stephen Jones, an inmate at the Burke County Jail in North Carolina, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit against jail officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court denied Jones any relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6126

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stephen Jones, an inmate at the Burke County Jail in North Carolina, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit against jail officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court denied Jones any relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views3 pages

    Jones v. Smith, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stephen Jones, an inmate at the Burke County Jail in North Carolina, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit against jail officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court denied Jones any relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6126

    STEPHEN T. JONES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MR. SMITH, the Captain of the Burke County
    Jail, Morgantown, North Carolina; VERA DOE,
    Correctional Officer at the Burke County Jail,
    individually and in her official capacity;
    SANDY DOE, Correctional Officer at the Burke
    County Jail, individually and in her official
    capacity; DIANN DOE, Correctional Officer at
    the Burke County Jail, individually and in her
    official capacity; CATHY DOE, Correctional
    Officer at the Burke County Jail, individually
    and in her official capacity; CANDY DOE, Correctional Officer at the Burke County Jail,
    individually and in her official capacity;
    PHILLIS BANNER, Nurse at the Burke County
    Jail, individually and in her official capacity; JOHN DOE 1, Dietician at the Burke County
    Jail, individually and in his official capacity; JANE DOE 1, Dietician at the Burke County
    Jail, individually and in her official capacity; JOHN DOE 2, Sergeant at the Burke County
    Jail, individually and in his official capacity; JANE DOE 2, Sergeant at the Burke County
    Jail, individually and in her official
    capacity,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Graham C. Mullen, District
    Judge. (CA-95-193-4-MU)

    Submitted:

    May 16, 1996

    Decided:

    June 5, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Stephen T. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Jones v. Smith, No. CA-95-193-4-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like