Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kambon v. Saint Augustine's, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Saint Augustine's College in a case brought by Kamau Kambon alleging age discrimination. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had ruled in favor of Saint Augustine's College on Kambon's age discrimination claim. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the written materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-03-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-2009

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Saint Augustine's College in a case brought by Kamau Kambon alleging age discrimination. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had ruled in favor of Saint Augustine's College on Kambon's age discrimination claim. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Kambon v. Saint Augustine's, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Saint Augustine's College in a case brought by Kamau Kambon alleging age discrimination. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had ruled in favor of Saint Augustine's College on Kambon's age discrimination claim. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-2009

    KAMAU KAMBON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SAINT AUGUSTINES COLLEGE,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    DIANNE SUBER, Dr.;
    MAURICE TAYLOR, Dr.,

    BEVERLY

    DOWNING,

    Dr.;
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-00-884-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    February 24, 2003

    Decided:

    Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    March 10, 2003

    Alan McSurely, Ashley Osment, MCSURELY & OSMENT, Chapel Hill, North
    Carolina, for Appellant. Charles T. Francis, FRANCIS & AUSTIN,
    P.L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina; Randall M. Roden, THARRINGTON
    SMITH, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kamau Kambon appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Saint Augustines
    College, on his age discrimination claim.

    We have reviewed the

    record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the


    See Kambon v. Saint Augustines

    reasoning of the district court.

    College, No. CA-00-884-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 30, 2002).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like