Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Haigler v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    George Haigler Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6494

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Haigler Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Haigler v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Haigler Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6494

    GEORGE HAIGLER, JR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON,
    Attorney General,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-97-3070-0-17BD)

    Submitted:

    July 2, 1998

    Decided:

    July 29, 1998

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    George Haigler, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    George Haigler, Jr., seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254
    (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the
    district courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
    certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Haigler v. South Carolina, No. CA-973070-0-17BD (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like