Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Washington v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mark Washington appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Washington was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Washington v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Mark Washington appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Washington was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6503

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mark Washington appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Washington was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Washington v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mark Washington appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Washington was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6503

    MARK WASHINGTON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL MOORE, Director of South Carolina
    Department of Corrections; CHARLES MOLONY
    CONDON, Attorney General,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-98-19-2-12AJ)

    Submitted:

    June 17, 1999

    Decided:

    June 23, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Mark Washington, Appellant Pro Se.
    Donald John Zelenka, Chief
    Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark Washington appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Washington v. Moore, No. CA-98-19-2-12AJ (D.S.C.

    Mar. 17, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like