Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cardell Spalding v. Aaron Johnson Nathan A. Rice, 802 F.2d 451, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Cardell Spaulding under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against Aaron Johnson and Nathan A. Rice. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The appeals court also determined the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively, so they affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-09-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 802 F.2d 451 Docket: 86-6618

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Cardell Spaulding under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against Aaron Johnson and Nathan A. Rice. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The appeals court also determined the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively, so they affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    Cardell Spalding v. Aaron Johnson Nathan A. Rice, 802 F.2d 451, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Cardell Spaulding under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against Aaron Johnson and Nathan A. Rice. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The appeals court also determined the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively, so they affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    802 F.

    2d 451
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Cardell SPALDING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Aaron JOHNSON; Nathan A. Rice, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 86-6618.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 11, 1986.
    Decided Sept. 30, 1986.

    Cardell Spaulding, appellant pro se.


    Jacob L. Safron, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL, PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the district court. Spaulding v. Johnson, C/A No. 85-1239-CRT (E.D.N.C., May
    14, 1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like