Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William Davis, II v. Albert Singer, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Scott Davis's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court can only hear appeals of final orders or certain interlocutory orders, but the order Davis sought to appeal - which denied his motions to file exhibits under seal, appoint counsel, and for preliminary injunction - was not a final or appealable interlocutory order. The court also denied Davis's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1649

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Scott Davis's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court can only hear appeals of final orders or certain interlocutory orders, but the order Davis sought to appeal - which denied his motions to file exhibits under seal, appoint counsel, and for preliminary injunction - was not a final or appealable interlocutory order. The court also denied Davis's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    William Davis, II v. Albert Singer, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Scott Davis's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court can only hear appeals of final orders or certain interlocutory orders, but the order Davis sought to appeal - which denied his motions to file exhibits under seal, appoint counsel, and for preliminary injunction - was not a final or appealable interlocutory order. The court also denied Davis's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1649

    WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II;


    BABY J.F.D., c/o William
    Davis, II; ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased,

    S.

    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    ALBERT J. SINGER; WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT; DANIELLE DOYLE;
    SYDNEY J. BATCH; BATCH, POORE & WILLIAMS; MICHELE JAWORSKI
    SUAREZ; MELANIE A. SHEKITA; MICHELLE SAVAGE; ERIC CRAIG
    CHASSE; LISA SELLERS; CHARLOTTE MITCHELL; WENDY KIRWAN;
    SONJI CARLTON; NANCEY BERSON; SUSAN GARVEY, Doctor; ROBERT
    B. RADAR; MARGARET EAGLES; RICHARD CROUTHARMEL,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.
    Rebecca Beach Smith,
    Chief District Judge. (4:13-cv-00007-RBS-DEM)

    Submitted:

    June 20, 2013

    Decided:

    June 25, 2013

    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William

    Scott

    Davis

    seeks

    to

    appeal

    the

    district

    courts order denying his motion for an order to file exhibits


    under

    seal,

    motions

    to

    appoint

    counsel,

    and

    motions

    for

    preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order.


    court

    may

    exercise

    jurisdiction

    only

    over

    final

    This

    orders,

    28

    U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral


    orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

    The

    order Davis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an


    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

    Accordingly, we

    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    We deny Davis

    motion for the appointment of counsel.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like