Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Bruce M. Crow v. Commissioner of The Internal Revenue Service, 92 F.3d 1177, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the tax court's granting of summary judgment to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service in the case of Bruce M. Crow v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors in the tax court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Bruce M. Crow v. Commissioner of The Internal Revenue Service, 92 F.3d 1177, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the tax court's granting of summary judgment to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service in the case of Bruce M. Crow v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors in the tax court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 92 F.3d 1177 Docket: 96-1250

    Original Title

    Bruce M. Crow v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, 92 F.3d 1177, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the tax court's granting of summary judgment to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service in the case of Bruce M. Crow v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors in the tax court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views1 page

    Bruce M. Crow v. Commissioner of The Internal Revenue Service, 92 F.3d 1177, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the tax court's granting of summary judgment to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service in the case of Bruce M. Crow v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors in the tax court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    92 F.

    3d 1177
    78 A.F.T.R.2d 96-6060, 96-2 USTC P 50,403

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Bruce M. CROW, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE
    SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 96-1250.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 23, 1996.
    Decided July 30, 1996.

    Bruce M. Crow, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Kevin Martin Brown,
    Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM
    1

    Appellant appeals from the tax court's order granting summary judgment to the
    Appellee. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court.
    Crow v. Commissioner, No. 95-1855 (Tax Ct. Dec. 7, 1995). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like